Elevated EUCOM Moscow ยท Russia ยท Europe

Trump Rules Out Russian Attack on NATO and Poland Rejects Hosting Warheads

SPACECOM STRATCOM TRANSCOM
European Command Area of Responsibility

European Command Area of Responsibility Credit: Open Street Map, Modified Copernicus Sentinel data

EUROPE — After CIA Director John Ratcliffe met Russian intelligence officials in Moscow on August 25, Washington and Moscow both said in public that NATO territory is not a Russian target.

The White House, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Kremlin, and the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) have issued no readout of what was said.

Poland used the same Brussels window to reject storing nuclear warheads on its soil while asking for a role in NATO nuclear deterrence. Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania held their national threat assessments steady.

Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell and U.S. Army Col. Martin O’Donnell, a senior NATO military spokesman, rejected a Europe-only Patriot collapse. The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) still counts a large global interceptor drawdown after the Iran war.

Ukraine reported a large missile-and-drone barrage overnight August 26-27 and an Air Force intercept tally. Moscow, on the same day it denied a plan to attack NATO territory, named British military sites outside Ukraine as possible targets.

Finland and Sweden added air and sea patrols along Finland’s border and said Finland faces no direct military threat.

Belarusian President Aleksandr Lukashenko arrived in Russia for security talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin as U.S. Under Secretary of War for Policy Elbridge Colby told NATO ambassadors the Europe force-posture review is meant to shift the alliance toward a European-led conventional defense.

Locations Affected

Latest Developments

Moscow Names British Military Sites While Denying a Baltic Attack Plan

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said on August 27 that any British military installations and equipment in Ukraine and beyond its borders could be targeted in response to Ukrainian strikes on Russian territory carried out using British weapons.

She said London was one step away from legal complicity, in Moscow’s description, in what she called terrorism against Russian civilians, and warned of what she called “catastrophic consequences” unless Britain changed course. She also said Britain and France were “playing with fire” by supplying missile technology to Ukraine.

The British Ministry of Defense said Britain stands shoulder to shoulder with Ukraine and is committed to providing the equipment Ukraine needs to defend itself against what the ministry called Putin’s illegal invasion.

The spokesman said Russia should be in no doubt about the resolve of the government to stand against Russian aggression in Ukraine and against the United Kingdom and its allies.

British Prime Minister Andy Burnham announced on August 24 that the United Kingdom would give Ukraine access to technology to produce Storm Shadow cruise missiles.

France had already licensed the related SCALP technology. Peskov had described that technology decision as “adding fuel to the fire.” Burnham, asked about that phrase in Kyiv, said the question is who started the fire.

Ukraine’s Air Force said Russia launched ballistic missiles, two Oniks anti-ship missiles, and 258 strike drones against Ukraine on the night of August 26-27, and that Ukrainian defenses shot down or jammed 233 of those aerial assets.

The service said the attack used Iskander-M or KN-23 ballistic missiles from Bryansk and Kursk, two Oniks missiles from occupied Crimea, and strike drones of Shahed, Gerbera, S8000 Banderol, and decoy types.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said the Russians struck critical infrastructure in the Poltava, Sumy, and Kherson regions and residential buildings in the Kharkiv region.

On August 23 in Kyiv, the leaders of Ukraine and the Nordic-Baltic Eight (Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, and Sweden) issued a joint declaration reaffirming support for Ukraine’s independence and territorial integrity and pledging continued defense assistance into next year and beyond.

Finland and Sweden Add Northern Air Surveillance, Not a Baltic Invasion Alert

The Finnish Defense Forces said on August 28 that they are deepening cooperation with Sweden to strengthen surveillance and protection of Finland’s territorial integrity.

Sweden will take part with JAS 39 Gripen fighters and a Visby-class corvette in the Baltic Sea region, at least until the end of the year. The Swedish aircraft are to strengthen air surveillance so Finnish units can be freed to repel violations if needed.

The same statement said no direct military threat is directed against Finland. It attributed recent airspace problems to drones from Ukraine’s campaign against Russia that have strayed into Finnish airspace and territory, and said those attacks on Russia are not likely to end soon.

Swedish Defense Minister Pal Jonson said collective defense is a core element of the two countries’ cooperation and that Allies share a view on strong deterrence on the eastern flank.

Finnish Defense Minister Antti Hakkanen said air and maritime cooperation was already integral and that the two countries are now moving to territorial surveillance and protection of territorial integrity, in line with NATO work.

Nuclear Threat Note

No official source has reported a change in U.S., NATO, or Russian nuclear alert status as of August 28. Poland’s on-record position is participation in NATO nuclear deterrence without storing warheads.

Dual-capable aircraft entry, if granted, would add Polish F-35A crews to the mission while leaving U.S. bombs in existing host states.

NATO’s June Nuclear Planning Group text reaffirmed modernization of the nuclear mission. NATO’s public record continues to state that Russia has announced nuclear weapons in Belarus.

No International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), U.S. Department of Energy, or NATO statement this week reported movement of those Belarus-based systems.

Official Statements

Full Report & Analysis

The full report includes expert analysis and risk assessment.

Full Report & Analysis →

Understanding Global Threats

Browse All Topics & Pages

Complete sitemap with all intelligence resources

View Sitemap →

Related Preparedness Gear

Be prepared for evolving situations

Global Conflict Map

Live snapshot of conflict locations and tension zones worldwide.

Last update on: August 28, 2026

Related Alerts

Keep Exploring